Wednesday, October 27, 2010

...Danaparamita

I read more of The Six Perfections by Dale S. Wright, and decided that a good understanding of the six characteristics of an awakened mind are pretty important to the overall forward movement of my spiritual path. So, I'm going to work my way through the book and share with you what I learn. Today I want to focus specifically on the first perfection-the perfection of generosity, or danaparamita.

What exactly is generosity? Most of the time we like to think of it as an act of giving, and this is very true. However, not every act of giving is considered a perfection of generosity. True generosity, according to Buddhist dharma, lies in giving without self-satisfaction in the act. If a person gives something to another person and feels good about the fact that they gave something, then the motivation for the giving was impure and therefore not really generous. How many times have I given without feeling some self satisfaction in return? Hmmm....I can count the number of times on one hand. I can recall that in those few times when I felt no self-satisfaction, the generous act felt like a sacrifice against my own well being rather than a helpful gift. I talked to a friend about what she thinks of generosity before I read the chapter, and she felt the same way I did. She said her main motivation for giving, no matter how bad it might sound, always has some kind of basis in how good it will make her feel, and if she doesn't feel good about it she feels like she's losing something in order for the other person to gain. There is always some emotion attached to the giving process, whether positive or negative, and according to Buddhism neither feeling is pure generosity.

How does one give without feeling some self-satisfaction or some other emotion? It appears to lie within that one word I wrote in the last sentence of the last paragraph..."attachment." A very important aspect of Mahayana (or Middle Way) Buddhist philosophy is emptiness, sunyata in Sanskrit. Sunyata relates to what I wrote in my last post about dependence. According to Mahayana Buddhists, we are nothing without everything else. We can not give to someone without everything else in our life making that possible-for example parents giving birth to and teaching us about generosity in the first place, or our employers giving us financial capability to give. We can't give without the environmental factors which make it possible, and we can't give without someone needing the gift. We have to realize that giving is not something which comes from us as individuals, but from everything around us that allows for it to happen. When we realize that what we give has nothing to do with our individuality and everything to do with what made it possible for us to give, then we can detach from the idea that the satisfaction in  giving is ours for the taking. The gift, the giver, and the recipient all depend on one another and are all part of one another. One cannot exist without the other. Giving then, is not taking something of mine and making it yours-congratulations-but rather, it is mine and yours and everyone's all at the same time. When a person thinks of giving in this sense, one can grasp that generosity is nothing more than giving because someone is in need.

We have to be careful in our generosity, however, as we do run the risk of turning the generous act into one of self sacrifice. We also run the risk of harming someone else with our generosity. We can not just say "what is mine is yours." For example, we can not just give someone all our money because they need it and ask for it. We have to think, will this really benefit the other person in the long run? Will they learn that they can't spend all their money on designer clothes and golf gear and still pay their bills, or will they learn that they can spend all their money on luxury and then just ask you for the money to pay their bills? Will you be able to pay your bills? Will you end up having to ask someone else for help as a result of your gift? We have to be smart about it, and think long and hard before we give. Giving can sometimes have the exact opposite effect of the one we want it to have. Sometimes the most generous thing we can do for someone else is not give. If we don't give all our cash to the person who asks for it, they might learn that they can't spend all of theirs on unnecessary luxuries and then expect to pay their bills-and who knows, maybe next time that person will not buy designer clothes and golf clubs until they have paid their bills. Then, they will have the security of knowing their bills are paid for another month, we will have the security of knowing our bills are paid, and our friends and family will have the security of knowing their bills are paid and no one had to ask anyone else to perform self sacrifice in the process.

The most important step in cultivating the perfection of generosity is practicing it. If we don't practice it, we won't ever learn it. I can sit here and write all I want about it, but if I'm not working on it every single day of my life, then I will never live it. I can't simply rid myself of all the ideas I've had about generosity over night. Finding danaparamita takes time, active pursuit, and meditation. I promise to myself and to you that every time I meditate, and every time I wake up I will think of this, imagine it in every possible way, and live it to the fullest. If you want to pursue this perfection with me, it does not mean you have to go around giving to everyone in need-especially if you don't have the resources to do so.  Imagination is a powerful thing, and when you meditate, just imagine that everything is part of everything else, and think of giving-you can imagine yourself giving to someone you know who is in need. The great thing about imagination is that we can often do things beyond our physical limitations. So, when I meditate, I will use my imagination and I will give whatever is needed...simply because it is needed. When I go about my life, I will practice wise generosity.

Monday, October 11, 2010

...Paramita

"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense."
-Siddharta Gautama Buddha

What does "perfection" mean? To most of us, myself included, the idea of perfection connotes something that just can not get better. It is the ultimate. After perfection, there is nothing. To most of us, there is one state of perfection, one ultimate. We generally like to call this "God," and generally believe it is a state which we are incapable of achieving. So, when I stumbled across a book in the library today called "The Six Perfections" by Dale S. Wright, I found myself wondering, "six?" and feeling a bit skeptical and very intrigued. I've only read the introduction of the book so far, but it was enough for me to discover something very interesting. The six perfections, or paramitas, as they are called in Sanskrit, do not describe perfection in the sense of "the end of the road" or "that one ultimate thing that is better than anything else." Rather, they are simply qualities or characteristics which enlightened beings strive to live for every day. Basically, perfection, rather than being the end of the road, is in fact the road itself. Perfection, according to Buddhists, encompasses the characteristics of giving, moral behavior, tolerance/patience, vigor, meditation, and wisdom. We could not hope to become enlightened beings if we do not build our path upon these principles. Of course, says Wright, most of us English speakers think perfection is something that can't get any better and that it is completely out of our reach. We were taught to understand the function of the word as this. In the Buddhist framework of reality, however, this concept of perfection is very, very flawed and very, very harmful.

Now hold on a minute, my brain shouted upon first reading this philosophy. What then, is "enlightenment?" Isn't enlightenment equal to our understanding of perfection? Isn't enlightenment that end state Buddhists hope to reach in order to achieve knowledge of and compassion for all things? Isn't that the one state which can not get any better? Isn't an "enlightened being" perfect? This just doesn't make any sense.

Here's where it can get tricky. An enlightened being is indeed perfect, but at the same time, the enlightened being understands that perfection can always be better and is always evolving. This seems paradoxical to my English brain. If we think, however, of the notion of impermanence-that nothing is forever, "this too shall pass," then it starts to make a little more sense. If the rule is true that there is no such thing as permanent, if everything changes, then perfection can not possibly be outside of this rule. It gets really tricky if we think in terms of inter-connectivity and dependence: that in order for perfection to be an exception to impermanence, it would have to be entirely contained within itself, independent. We would not be able to affect or achieve it in any way and vice versa. Not so far off, many of us might say. The only thing that could achieve it is the omnipotent being known by most of us as "God." But then, God does affect us, whether we agree with the concept of God or not. And, alternately, we affect God (i.e. in the Bible, the reason Adam and Eve were thrown out of Eden, the reason God flooded the earth, the reason Jesus came from the heavens). Basically, it seems to me that no matter how you look at it, things change, and everything depends on and is connected to everything else. People don't practice Christianity the same way they practiced it in ancient times, and the state of enlightenment is not the same as it was when Gautama Buddha achieved it. But this does not mean perfection does not exist in these things anymore. It simply means the idea of perfection changed, evolved with the times, adapted to the circumstances of the universe. According to Buddhist thought, enlightenment, perfection, is the understanding of impermanence and is the ability to expand one's mind to include such inevitable change without sacrificing practice of the six characteristics. Enlightenment and perfection, therefore, can be the end of nothing. It can not be and at the same time it is the ultimate existence, ever changing and ever expanding.

And therefore, I shall strive to find paramita in every breath I take.

Sunday, October 3, 2010

...A Little Piece of Heaven in a Texas Suburb

How did I find my little piece of heaven? On the back of my Dad's newly acquired Harley Davidson. I have never been on a motorcycle before, and I would be lying if I said I wasn't a little nervous. But before I could give my nerves more than a moment's thought, a big black helmet was strapped to my head, my feet were set on the footpegs, the rumbling motor was started, and we were off.

Without any hesitation the wind commenced blowing over my body, the sun commenced shining on my back, the grass commenced smelling fresh, and I commenced forgetting about those silly little nerves, which were quickly replaced with a gaping, open-mouth grin. I don't think even a thousand flies smacking my teeth would have made that grin disappear. Let me tell you, there is no cool-looking chick with dark eyes and a sleek leather jacket when you ride with me. Oh no. You get the girl with the gigantic grin under a huge helmet who flaps about clumsily in her seat and wants to wave at everyone to let them know she's riding on a Harley, just in case they couldn't tell.

What a feeling, this joy so powerful I could not have hidden it if I tried. Riding on that motorcycle felt like freedom-pure, unadulturated freedom. I rode through the symphony of the world, keeping its beat with the deep bass rythym of our engine and sometimes playing in superb harmony with the other bikes on the road. I think though, that the whole reason I enjoyed the ride so much (other than getting to spend time with my Dad) was that I let myself enjoy it. I actively allowed my body to take in the experience, working to clear my mind of all other thoughts unrelated to what was happening right now. I meditated on the back of that motorcycle, opening my mind to a new experience of mindful inner and outer awareness. I understood the possibilities in those moments of joy I found on the back of my Dad's Harley-if I could experience something so wonderful on the back of a motorcycle, who is to say that I can't have that with every breath I take every day of my life? After all, as much as it might seem contrary at the moment, everlasting joy does not reside in the motorcycle. My heaven didn't stay on the bike when the ride was over. It isn't waiting for me in the foot pegs, big helmet, and seat cushion. It hopped right off that bike with me, living within me as it lives in all of us. It is ours to awaken and ours to nurture. Yes, my little piece of heaven lives in this Texas suburb. It sleeps with me, laughs with me, cries with me, gives me little glimpses of its beauty every now and again just to remind me what I'm living for. And trust me, Heaven, I'll be back.